CLEAN : Kenya court clears ICC indicted

The transcript discusses a court case involving the Attorney General and respondents related to an election. The court carefully considered petitions and responses, ultimately deciding that the relief sought by the petitioners could not be granted. Despite serious charges against the respondents, they are presumed innocent under the Constitution. The court emphasized the importance of fundamental rights and declared that the candidates could not be barred from contesting the presidency, highlighting the judiciary's role in upholding democratic principles.

What was the court's decision regarding the relief sought by the petitioners?

• The relief was granted.

• The relief was partially granted.

• The relief was denied.

• The relief was postponed.

Under which article of the Constitution are the 3rd and 4th respondents presumed innocent?

• Article 10

• Article 35

• Article 50

• Article 25

What is the significance of Article 25 in the context of the respondents' rights?

• It ensures that certain rights cannot be limited.

• It provides for the right to a fair trial.

• It outlines the process for constitutional amendments.

• It allows for the limitation of fundamental rights.

What was the court's decision regarding Mr. Kenyatta and his running mate's eligibility?

• They were barred from contesting.

• Their eligibility was undecided.

• They were allowed to contest.

• They were required to reapply.

What does the court's decision signify for the democratic process in Kenya?

• It undermines the rule of law.

• It allows for shortcuts to power.

• It reinforces the importance of democratic processes.

• It limits the power of the judiciary.