CLEAN : Both sides gain in US affirmative action

The transcript discusses the Supreme Court's decision on affirmative action and diversity in education. It highlights the legal challenges faced by universities, the court's moderate stance, and the implications of the decision. The court ruled that diversity is beneficial, but universities must justify racial preferences. The decision was seen as a relief by supporters of the University of Texas, as it did not eliminate affirmative action but required strong justification for its use.

What is one reason why university programs can remain unchanged for a long time?

• They are universally accepted.

• They are protected by international law.

• They benefit from legal inertia until challenged in court.

• They are frequently updated by universities.

What did the Supreme Court say about diversity in educational institutions?

• Diversity is only important in private institutions.

• Diversity should be eliminated from educational policies.

• Diversity is a positive benefit that universities can pursue.

• Diversity is not a concern for educational institutions.

Under what condition can a university give racial preference?

• If it receives government funding.

• If it has a historical precedent.

• If it has a very good reason and no alternative solutions.

• If it is a private institution.

How does the Supreme Court approach problems related to affirmative action?

• By taking a moderate and incremental approach.

• By ignoring them completely.

• By delegating them to lower courts.

• By making radical changes.

How did the supporters of the University of Texas react to the Supreme Court's decision?

• They decided to change their policies.

• They were indifferent to the outcome.

• They were pleased with the result.

• They were disappointed and planned to appeal.