CLEAN : South Africa: Judge criticises failure to arrest Bashir

The transcript discusses a court's declaration that the failure to arrest Sudan's President Bashir is inconsistent with South Africa's Constitution. It highlights the potential for UN intervention and criticizes government officials for disrespecting court orders. The transcript also seeks details on Bashir's exit from the country.

What did the court declare about the actions of the respondents regarding President Bashir?

• Their actions were consistent with South Africa's Constitution.

• Their failure to arrest President Bashir was unconstitutional.

• They were praised for their diplomatic efforts.

• They acted in accordance with international law.

How can the judgment against President Bashir be enforced?

• By the United Nations Security Council.

• Through a bilateral agreement between Sudan and South Africa.

• Through a local South African court order.

• By the African Union.

What is the potential outcome of the UN Security Council's involvement?

• A peace treaty between Sudan and South Africa.

• A resolution for President Bashir to be arrested in his own country.

• A diplomatic immunity for President Bashir.

• A financial sanction against South Africa.

What concern does the court have about the South African government's actions?

• They have shown disrespect for the court's orders.

• They have overstepped their legal boundaries.

• They have failed to communicate with international bodies.

• They have been too lenient with immigration policies.

What information is expected regarding President Bashir's departure from South Africa?

• The port of entry and officials who signed him out.

• The reason for his visit to South Africa.

• Details of his diplomatic meetings.

• The duration of his stay in South Africa.