Clinton, Trump Clash in Second Presidential Debate

Clinton, Trump Clash in Second Presidential Debate

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript covers a debate where Donald Trump, facing political challenges, took an aggressive stance against Hillary Clinton, focusing on their past controversies. The debate also touched on policy issues, particularly foreign policy, where Trump admitted not consulting his running mate. Clinton countered by questioning Trump's suitability for presidency. The debate's impact on markets, especially the Mexican peso, was noted, and the event is expected to be analyzed for years.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Donald Trump's strategy during the debate according to the first section?

He focused on discussing his policies.

He attacked the Clintons and defended his candidacy.

He announced his withdrawal from the race.

He avoided any controversial topics.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did the markets react to the debate, as mentioned in the second section?

The markets were unaffected by the debate.

The Mexican peso was used as a barometer for Trump's success.

The markets favored Hillary Clinton.

The stock market crashed immediately.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What significant change occurred in the debate after the initial exchanges?

The moderators took control of the debate.

Both candidates agreed on all issues.

The focus shifted to policy discussions.

The debate ended abruptly.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What foreign policy issue did Trump reportedly not consult with his running mate on?

Healthcare

Terrorism

Climate change

Trade agreements

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was one of the criticisms Hillary Clinton had against Donald Trump?

He had no controversies.

He lacked the temperament to be president.

He was too experienced.

He was too focused on foreign policy.