JPMorgan's O'Brien: The Case for U.S. Fiscal Spending

JPMorgan's O'Brien: The Case for U.S. Fiscal Spending

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses the limitations of monetary policy and the potential benefits of combining it with fiscal policy, as seen in the Trump administration. It highlights the low cost of borrowing and the end of the QE program as opportunities for economic growth through infrastructure investment. The discussion also covers the demand for infrastructure investments from pension and sovereign wealth funds. Finally, it addresses the impact of GDP expectations on economic growth and market dynamics.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a key limitation of monetary policy and quantitative easing?

They can only stabilize economies, not grow them.

They are effective in promoting rapid economic growth.

They primarily focus on increasing tax revenues.

They are designed to reduce government spending.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the combination of fiscal and monetary policies benefit the economy?

It reduces the need for infrastructure investment.

It leads to higher inflation rates.

It creates opportunities for economic growth.

It increases the cost of borrowing.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the significance of the low cost of borrowing in the current economic context?

It discourages infrastructure investment.

It reduces the demand for fiscal policies.

It leads to higher interest rates.

It ties in with the end of the QE program to promote growth.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which funds are likely to invest in infrastructure according to the transcript?

Hedge funds and mutual funds

US pension funds and European sovereign wealth funds

Venture capital funds

Private equity funds

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What could happen if GDP targets are not met?

It would result in higher tax rates.

It would lead to an increase in infrastructure spending.

It would change the dynamic scoring and market expectations.

It would have no impact on economic growth expectations.