CLEAN : Refugee assistance group welcomes travel ban freeze

The transcript discusses the detainment of clients from Iraq and the legal challenges against the travel and refugee bans imposed by the Trump administration. It highlights the court's repeated rulings deeming the bans unconstitutional and the discriminatory impact on individuals from certain countries. The speaker expresses concern over ongoing Islamophobia and speculates on future legal battles if the administration attempts to reinstate the ban.

What was the initial reaction when clients were detained at the airport?

• They waited for further instructions.

• They immediately went to the airport.

• They contacted the media.

• They ignored the situation.

What was the effect of Judge Washines' temporary restraining order?

• It allowed the travel ban to continue.

• It reinforced the travel ban.

• It halted the travel and refugee bans.

• It had no effect on the travel ban.

How have the courts responded to the travel ban?

• They have only ruled once on the matter.

• They have not made any rulings.

• They have supported the travel ban.

• They have consistently ruled it unconstitutional.

What has been a consequence of the administration's intent regarding the travel ban?

• More support for the travel ban.

• Increased tourism from affected countries.

• A rise in Islamophobia across the country.

• A decrease in legal challenges.

What is the likely outcome if the administration attempts to enforce the travel ban again?

• The courts will likely uphold the ban.

• The courts will likely rule it unconstitutional again.

• The ban will be enforced without challenge.

• The administration will not attempt it again.