CLEAN : Travellers at New York JFK question electronics ban

The transcript discusses the absurdity of device dependency, arguing against the effectiveness of banning electronics to prevent terrorism. It questions the fairness of different treatments for American citizens and non-citizens, highlighting the fear and misunderstanding faced by Muslims in the US. The speaker expresses frustration over being unfairly associated with terrorism due to past events.

What is the speaker's opinion on the dependency of iPads on iPhones?

• They are indifferent.

• They find it ridiculous.

• They think it's necessary.

• They find it convenient.

Why does the speaker believe banning electronics won't stop terrorism?

• Terrorists can use other means.

• Electronics are too expensive.

• Bans are hard to enforce.

• People will protest.

What concern does the speaker raise about American citizens?

• They are misunderstood.

• They have fewer rights.

• They face more restrictions.

• They have more privileges.

How does the speaker feel about the treatment of Muslims in the US?

• They feel privileged.

• They feel welcomed.

• They feel scared.

• They feel indifferent.

What distinction does the speaker make regarding past acts of terrorism?

• They were exaggerated.

• They were not committed by all Muslims.

• They were committed by everyone.

• They were justified.