Theresa May criticised for refusing to take part in TV Debates - UK 2017 General Election

The transcript discusses the importance of transparency in elections and the role of TV debates in shaping public perception. It highlights the impact of the 2010 UK election debates, where performance was prioritized over policy. The significance of TV debates in engaging the electorate and focusing national attention is emphasized. The current scenario where the Prime Minister refuses to participate in debates is explored, with arguments for and against her decision. The democratic value of debates is underscored, suggesting that their absence could harm public engagement and democracy.

Why is it important for candidates to be transparent about their finances during elections?

• To ensure they have enough funds for their campaign

• To gain public trust and credibility

• To avoid media scrutiny

• To comply with legal requirements

What was a key factor in the success of the Lib Dem leader during the 2010 UK general election debates?

• His party's popularity

• His performance and delivery

• His policy proposals

• His financial transparency

How do TV debates influence the electorate during elections?

• They provide entertainment

• They reduce campaign costs

• They focus national attention on key issues

• They increase voter turnout

Why might a political leader choose not to participate in a TV debate?

• To focus on policy development

• To save campaign resources

• To maintain a lead in the polls

• To avoid public scrutiny

What is a potential consequence of not having debates in modern elections?

• Damage to democracy and public engagement

• Improved candidate performance

• Enhanced media coverage

• Increased voter turnout