Sally Yates and James Clapper appear before the Senate Judicial Subcommittee

The transcript discusses electronic surveillance on foreign intelligence targets and the involvement of US persons. It explains the necessity of unmasking under Section 702 of the FISA Amendment Act. The speaker addresses a committee, discussing the handling of classified information and clarifying that non-disclosure should not imply confirmation of collusion. The importance of understanding the context and limitations of intelligence sharing is emphasized.

What is the primary focus of electronic surveillance discussed in the first section?

• Monitoring domestic communications

• Surveillance on foreign intelligence targets

• Tracking financial transactions

• Observing social media activities

Why is unmasking necessary according to the second section?

• To reveal the identity of foreign targets

• To provide context for intelligence analysis

• To comply with international laws

• To protect the privacy of US citizens

Which legal framework is mentioned in relation to unmasking requests?

• National Defense Authorization Act

• Homeland Security Act

• FISA Amendment Act

• Patriot Act

What challenge is highlighted in discussing evidence of collusion?

• Lack of evidence

• Political bias

• Revealing classified information

• Public misunderstanding

What should not be assumed if an official declines to answer a question about collusion?

• That the question is irrelevant

• That the answer is yes

• That the official is uninformed

• That the answer is no