CLEAN : Tapes of Trump Comey talks would tangle up Trump says expert

The transcript discusses a conference, the expected testimony of a former FBI director, and comparisons to the Watergate scandal. It highlights the political implications and the ongoing investigation, focusing on the potential existence of tapes that could be subpoenaed. The discussion emphasizes the historical context of presidential recordings and their impact on investigations.

What was the general sentiment about the former FBI director's testimony?

• It was irrelevant and ignored.

• It was confusing and unclear.

• It was anticipated and unsurprising.

• It was unexpected and shocking.

How does the speaker compare the current situation to past presidential actions?

• It is similar to the Watergate scandal.

• It is more severe than any past actions.

• It is less clear than past actions.

• It is completely unrelated to past events.

What is the speaker's view on the Senate's role in the investigation?

• The Senate will likely dismiss the case.

• The Senate has already made a decision.

• The Senate will probably continue the investigation.

• The Senate is not involved in the decision.

Why are the tapes considered crucial in the investigation?

• They can be used to exonerate the president.

• They provide clear evidence of wrongdoing.

• They are irrelevant to the investigation.

• They can be subpoenaed and reviewed.

What historical trend does the speaker mention about presidents?

• Presidents have always avoided recording themselves.

• Presidents have always been transparent.

• Presidents have consistently recorded themselves.

• Presidents have never been involved in scandals.