CLEAN : File: S.Africa court rules Zuma should face almost 800 charges

The transcript discusses the decision to discontinue the prosecution of Mr. Zuma, deemed irrational due to pressure on Mr. Machete. It highlights the importance of upholding the oath of office and the need for Mr. Zuma to face charges in court. The continuation of charges is seen as a victory for the rule of law and political accountability in South Africa.

What was the decision made on April 1, 2009, regarding Mr. Zuma?

• To acquit Mr. Zuma

• To change the charges

• To discontinue the prosecution

• To continue the prosecution

What was the main reason for the irrational decision to discontinue the prosecution?

• Lack of evidence

• Change in legal team

• Public opinion

• Pressure faced by Mr. Himself

What did Mr. MC ignore when making his decision?

• The legal team's advice

• The public's opinion

• The media's influence

• The importance of the oath of office

What is the political party's stance on the charges against Jacob Zuma?

• They believe the charges should be dropped

• They support the continuation of charges

• They are indifferent to the charges

• They want a retrial

What is celebrated as a victory in the final section?

• The decision to drop charges

• The rule of law and accountability

• The acquittal of Mr. Zuma

• The change in legal proceedings