Could the Electoral college system ever change?

The video discusses the differences between the Electoral College and the national popular vote, highlighting instances where a candidate won the presidency without winning the popular vote. It explores the constitutional setup of the Electoral College, state laws regarding elector allocation, and the winner-take-all system. The discussion includes historical context, recent elections, and the legitimacy of the system. The video also touches on the global perspective of U.S. elections and their impact on democracy promotion worldwide.

What is a potential consequence of a candidate winning the presidency without the popular vote?

• Increased voter turnout

• More political parties

• A push towards a national popular vote

• A decrease in electoral participation

How are electors currently allocated in most states?

• By the national popular vote

• Through a winner-take-all system

• Randomly selected by the state

• Proportionally based on the popular vote

What change are some states considering regarding elector allocation?

• Increasing the number of electors

• Allocating electors based on the national popular vote

• Reducing the number of electors

• Allocating electors based on the state governor's choice

How often has the Electoral College outcome differed from the popular vote in recent history?

• Once in the last 50 years

• Never in the last 100 years

• Twice in the last 16 years

• Three times in the last 10 years

What impact does the Electoral College have on the U.S.'s global democratic image?

• It strengthens the image

• It has no impact

• It raises questions about the fairness of elections

• It is seen as a model for other countries