Baker vs. Carr Explained

The video discusses the Baker v. Carr Supreme Court decision of 1962, which addressed the issue of unequal representation in Tennessee due to outdated district lines. Charles Baker challenged this under the 14th Amendment, leading to a landmark decision that established the principle of 'one man, one vote.' The case shifted the view from a political to a judicial question, impacting civil rights and leading to changes in how states draw district lines. The video also touches on modern implications, such as voter ID laws, and the potential for gerrymandering.

What was the main issue that Charles Baker raised in the Baker v. Carr case?

• The outdated congressional district lines in Tennessee

• The unequal distribution of federal funds

• The imposition of unfair taxes

• The lack of voting rights for women

Why did the Supreme Court initially avoid addressing the issue raised in Baker v. Carr?

• They were waiting for a new census

• They lacked sufficient evidence

• They were focused on other cases

• They believed it was a political question

What was the significant change in the Supreme Court's approach in the Baker v. Carr case?

• They dismissed the case due to lack of jurisdiction

• They referred the case to Congress

• They ruled it was a judicial question, not a political one

• They decided to increase the number of justices

What potential negative consequence did the Baker v. Carr decision have?

• The reduction of state powers

• Increased voter turnout

• The rise of gerrymandering

• The abolition of the electoral college

How did the Baker v. Carr decision impact state legislatures?

• It gave them the power to veto federal laws

• It allowed them to set their own voting age

• It mandated equal representation in district lines

• It required them to hold elections every year