Outside Money Flow Into Campaigns

The video discusses the impact of the Citizens United Supreme Court decision on political spending, highlighting the increase in campaign ad spending and the role of anonymous funding. It explores the dynamics between political parties, special interest groups, and the implications of reforms aimed at reducing money in politics. The video concludes with differing perspectives on public financing and free speech in the political arena.

What was a significant outcome of the Citizens United Supreme Court decision?

• It required full disclosure of all political donations.

• It banned all political advertisements.

• It allowed unlimited spending by corporations and unions.

• It restricted corporate spending in politics.

What challenge is associated with anonymous groups in political advertising?

• They are banned from running political ads.

• They often have clear political affiliations.

• They are required to disclose all funding sources.

• Their funding sources are often undisclosed.

How did the switch of Senator Jim Jeffords from Republican to Democrat affect the Senate?

• It had no impact on the Senate's balance of power.

• It shifted control from Democrats to Republicans.

• It shifted control from Republicans to Democrats.

• It led to a new election for his seat.

What is a criticism of the current campaign financing system according to Ben Ginsberg?

• It provides too much power to political parties.

• It limits the amount of money candidates can raise.

• It allows too much money to be raised by candidates.

• It encourages transparency in political donations.

What is Tom Ferguson's view on public financing of campaigns?

• He believes it would increase special interest influence.

• He supports it as a way to share campaign costs.

• He thinks it would reduce campaign costs.

• He believes it is unnecessary.