Harvard Files Response to Admission-Bias Claim

The transcript discusses a lawsuit against Harvard University, alleging discrimination against Asian American applicants. The case, filed in 2014, is nearing trial and could significantly impact affirmative action policies. Harvard disputes the allegations, claiming data is cherry-picked. The Department of Justice is also interested, indicating broader implications for affirmative action.

What is Harvard's main argument against the allegations of discrimination?

• They admit to some level of discrimination.

• They have not responded to the allegations.

• They agree with the group's findings.

• They claim the group is cherry-picking information.

When was the lawsuit against Harvard filed by the group representing Asian American students?

• 2010

• 2014

• 2018

• 2020

What did the internal Harvard study allegedly reveal?

• Harvard's admission process is based solely on academic merit.

• Harvard's admission process is entirely fair.

• Harvard would have admitted more Asian Americans without discrimination.

• Harvard admitted more Asian Americans than any other group.

Who is bringing the case against Harvard, and what is their stance on affirmative action?

• A group supporting affirmative action.

• An individual with a history of opposing affirmative action.

• A government agency.

• A group of Harvard alumni.

Why is the Department of Justice interested in the Harvard case?

• They are trying to mediate between the parties.

• They are investigating Harvard for unrelated reasons.

• They have a substantial interest due to the affirmative action angle.

• They want to support Harvard's stance.