The Grenfell Tower Inquiry continues including evidence given by London Fire Brigade chief Dany Cotton.

The transcript involves a discussion about the timing and decision-making process regarding the 'stay put' advice during a fire incident. The Commissioner explains that decisions were made based on the information available at the time and emphasizes that it was not their role to speculate on the decisions made by officers on the scene. The conversation seeks to clarify the timing of when the 'stay put' advice became untenable and the rationale behind the decisions made.

What was the initial question posed to the Commissioner regarding the 'stay put' advice?

• When did the 'stay put' advice become untenable?

• Who was responsible for the 'stay put' advice?

• How effective was the 'stay put' advice?

• Why was the 'stay put' advice given?

According to the Commissioner, who was best placed to make decisions during the crisis?

• The officers on the ground

• The Commissioner

• The general public

• The government officials

What does the Commissioner emphasize about the decisions made by the officers?

• They were incorrect

• They were speculative

• They were based on sound information

• They were made by the Commissioner

What is the Commissioner's stance on determining the exact time the 'stay put' advice became untenable?

• It is their responsibility

• It is not their role

• It is the public's responsibility

• It is irrelevant

What does the Commissioner reiterate about the decision-making process?

• It was not their concern

• It was influenced by external factors

• It was based on the information available at the moment

• It was based on outdated information