Parents of Natasha Ednan-Laperouse call for a change in food labelling laws in the UK.

The transcript tells the tragic story of Natasha Adnan Laparus, who died from an allergic reaction to sesame in a Pret sandwich. Her parents had always been vigilant about her allergies, but the lack of labeling on the product led to her consuming sesame unknowingly. The family believes this is due to a legal loophole that benefits large corporations. The government is considering new legislation to prevent such incidents. Natasha's family continues to campaign for better labeling to honor her memory and protect others.

What was the main cause of Natasha's tragic incident?

• She ignored the warnings on the shelves.

• Her parents were not vigilant enough.

• The sandwich she ate was not labeled for allergens.

• She was not aware of her allergy.

Why do Natasha's parents believe the current food labeling laws are inadequate?

• They believe the laws are designed to protect large corporations.

• They think small companies are not following the rules.

• They feel the laws are too strict.

• They think the laws are not enforced properly.

What action is the Environment Secretary considering in response to Natasha's case?

• Providing more training for food industry staff.

• Introducing new legislation for better food labeling.

• Increasing fines for companies that don't label allergens.

• Banning sesame in all food products.

What motivates Natasha's parents to continue their campaign?

• The desire to start a new business.

• The wish to become public figures.

• The love and memory of their daughter.

• The need for financial compensation.

What is the emotional impact on Natasha's parents as they advocate for change?

• They feel empowered and happy.

• They experience a deep sense of loss and exhaustion.

• They are indifferent to the outcome.

• They are motivated by financial gain.