Natixis Marks Down Assets to Curb H2O Funds Unit Outflows

The transcript discusses a recent event where a fund experienced significant asset outflows following a Financial Times story about illiquid assets linked to Lars Windhorst. In response, Anna TX decided to mark down asset values, contrasting with other fund managers like Neil Woodford, who froze redemptions. This proactive approach was positively received by investors, highlighting different strategies in managing fund crises.

What was the main reason for the significant outflow from the fund discussed in the first section?

• A new investment strategy

• An increase in asset value

• A story by the Financial Times

• A change in management

How did Anna TX's approach to asset valuation differ from that of Neil Woodford?

• Anna TX froze redemptions

• Anna TX marked down asset values early

• Anna TX increased asset values

• Anna TX ignored the situation

Which fund manager is mentioned as having frozen redemptions?

• H2O Fund CEO

• Neil Woodford

• Anna TX

• Lars Windhorst

What was the market's reaction to Anna TX's strategy?

• The market was indifferent

• The market was confused

• The market reacted positively

• The market reacted negatively

What does the positive market reaction to Anna TX's strategy indicate about investor preferences?

• Investors prefer delayed action

• Investors appreciate transparency and immediate action

• Investors dislike aggressive markdowns

• Investors are indifferent to fund management strategies