Justice Ginsberg Says She Was Not 100% Supportive of Roe v. Wade

The transcript discusses the controversy surrounding a Supreme Court appointment, focusing on the nominee's stance on Roe v. Wade. Despite being a leading lawyer in gender discrimination, some women opposed her due to her nuanced view on the decision. The transcript analyzes the Roe v. Wade case, highlighting the extreme nature of the Texas law and the Supreme Court's sweeping decision. It also touches on the court's typical incremental approach and the public's expectation for unequivocal support of Roe v. Wade.

What was the role of Daniel Patrick Moynihan in the context of the Supreme Court appointment?

• He supported the appointment.

• He opposed the appointment.

• He was unaware of the appointment.

• He was indifferent to the appointment.

Why did some women not support the Supreme Court nominee?

• The nominee had no experience in gender discrimination law.

• The nominee was not a woman.

• The nominee was not fully supportive of Roe V. Wade.

• The nominee was not recommended by President Clinton.

What was the nominee's view on the Texas law related to Roe V. Wade?

• It was a moderate law.

• It was the most extreme in the nation.

• It was a lenient law.

• It was a typical law.

How did the Supreme Court's decision on Roe V. Wade differ from its usual approach?

• It was more gradual.

• It was more conservative.

• It was more sweeping.

• It was more delayed.

What was the criticism from some women regarding the nominee's stance on Roe V. Wade?

• The nominee was not supportive enough of Roe V. Wade.

• The nominee was too supportive of Roe V. Wade.

• The nominee wanted to overturn Roe V. Wade.

• The nominee had no opinion on Roe V. Wade.