CLEAN : Greenpeace boss criticises Chile and Brazil at COP25 in Madrid

CLEAN : Greenpeace boss criticises Chile and Brazil at COP25 in Madrid

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, Science, Business

9th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the briefings and speaker introductions at a conference, highlighting the inadequacies of the Paris Agreement text and urging the European Union to take action. It emphasizes the need for the Chilean Presidency to address public concerns and prevent carbon market companies from dominating the conference outcomes. The transcript also critiques Brazil's financial motives, stressing the importance of prioritizing environmental concerns for the planet's future.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main concern regarding the text related to the Paris Agreement?

It is too technical for the general public.

It has been accepted without any objections.

It is too lengthy.

It is not aligned with scientific recommendations.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What role is the Chilean Presidency expected to play in the climate conference?

To focus solely on technological advancements.

To listen to public demands and resist corporate influence.

To ignore the protests and focus on internal policies.

To prioritize economic growth over environmental concerns.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the potential positive action mentioned in the context of the Chilean Presidency?

Reducing public participation.

Becoming a positive actor in the climate fight.

Supporting carbon market companies.

Increasing carbon emissions.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What seems to be Brazil's primary focus at the conference?

Seeking financial support.

Promoting renewable energy.

Enhancing international cooperation.

Reducing carbon emissions.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the speaker view Brazil's approach to the conference?

As a model for other countries.

As a distraction from the main goals.

As a financial opportunity.

As a misalignment with planetary protection goals.