No breakthrough, says Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s husband after meeting with PM

The transcript discusses the UK government's reluctance to take a firm stance on Iran, highlighting a gap between the need for a tougher approach and the Foreign Office's instincts. It also touches on the UK's diplomatic balancing act between the US and Europe regarding Iran. The speaker emphasizes personal commitment to Nazneen and the importance of keeping her case visible to ensure government accountability.

What is the main issue the speaker identifies with the government's approach to Iran?

• The government is too aggressive.

• The government is reluctant to take a firm stance.

• The government is overly supportive of Iran.

• The government is ignoring Iran completely.

What does the speaker suggest is a gap in the government's approach to Iran?

• A gap between the UK and US policies.

• A gap between the need for tougher measures and the Foreign Office's cautious approach.

• A gap between public opinion and government policy.

• A gap between economic and military strategies.

How does the speaker describe the UK's position in its relations with Iran?

• As walking a tightrope between the US and Europe.

• As an adversary of both the US and Europe.

• As a neutral party.

• As a straightforward ally of the US.

What personal commitment does the speaker express?

• To mediate between the US and Iran.

• To keep the issue of Nazneen visible and hold the government accountable.

• To improve economic ties with Iran.

• To support the government's current stance.

What does the speaker emphasize about the future regarding Nazneen's situation?

• That it is solely a matter for the Foreign Office.

• That the government should ignore it.

• That complacency is not an option and visibility is crucial.

• That it will resolve itself without intervention.