CLEAN : Gloria Allred: We're just hoping that justice will be done in Weinstein case

The transcript covers a legal argument involving Miss Rotunno's claims, the prosecution's confidence in the jury's decision, the defendant's choice not to testify, and the credibility of witnesses. It highlights the seriousness of the jury and the hope for justice in the case against Harvey Weinstein.

What is the main point of the defense's argument in the trial?

• The prosecution lacks evidence.

• The jury is biased.

• There is no evidence of seeking compensation.

• The witnesses are unreliable.

What is the prosecution confident about regarding the jury?

• The jury will be influenced by the media.

• The jury will find Mr. Weinstein guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

• The jury will be unable to reach a verdict.

• The jury will find Mr. Weinstein innocent.

What decision did Mr. Weinstein make regarding his testimony?

• The judge decided for him.

• He decided to testify.

• He decided not to testify.

• His attorney decided for him.

How does the speaker view the jury's approach to the trial?

• The jury is taking it very seriously.

• The jury is indifferent.

• The jury is confused.

• The jury is not taking it seriously.

What is questioned about Mr. Weinstein's denial?

• Its credibility compared to witnesses who testified under oath.

• Its timing during the trial.

• Its legality.

• Its impact on the jury.