Is It WRONG If You Don't Vote? (Trump vs. Hillary) – 8-Bit Philosophy

The video discusses the impact of fear-based voting in politics, where voters often choose candidates they fear less rather than those they support. It explores consequentialist ethics, which judge actions by their outcomes, and how this affects voting behavior. The video references Jacques Ranciere's perspective on how ethical frameworks can harm politics by turning politicians into symbols of evil. It questions the sacrifices made to defeat perceived evil and the erosion of values in the process. Finally, it challenges viewers to consider the moral implications of their voting choices.

What is the main reason people are voting against candidates they fear?

• They believe the candidates are too young.

• They are concerned about the candidates' potential negative impact.

• They are influenced by the candidates' appearance.

• They think the candidates are not experienced enough.

According to Jacques Ranciere, what is the effect of viewing political opponents as ultimate evil?

• It leads to the destruction of politics.

• It strengthens democratic values.

• It promotes economic growth.

• It encourages peaceful negotiations.

What does the video suggest happens when politicians are seen as symbols of evil?

• They gain more media attention.

• They become more popular.

• They are more likely to win elections.

• They are no longer seen as policy advocates.

What is the potential consequence of sacrificing values to defeat a political opponent?

• Improved international relations.

• Increased voter turnout.

• Loss of core values and principles.

• Strengthening of democratic institutions.

What ethical question does the video pose about political strategies?

• Should voting be mandatory for all citizens?

• Is it better to have a multi-party system?

• Do the ends justify the means in political battles?

• Should we prioritize economic growth over social justice?