Gavin Williamson MP defending government response to A-level marking

The transcript discusses the impact of a grading system on disadvantaged students, highlighting concerns about bias and discrimination. It details Ofqual's efforts to prevent such bias and the criticism faced by the Department for Education (DfE) for not addressing these issues sooner. The transcript compares grading systems in England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, noting differences and the need for action based on evidence of anomalies in grading results.

What was the predicted impact of the grading system on A-level results according to the July report?

• 40% of results would be negatively affected

• 60% of results would be negatively affected

• 20% of results would be negatively affected

• 80% of results would be negatively affected

What was the main criticism of the Department for Education (DfE) regarding the grading system?

• They were praised for their quick response

• They collaborated effectively with Ofqual

• They ignored warnings about the system's flaws

• They provided additional support to students

Which groups were emphasized as needing protection from adverse effects in the grading system?

• Children from disadvantaged and ethnic minority backgrounds

• Students from urban areas

• Students from private schools

• Children from rural areas

How did the grading system in England compare to that in Scotland?

• It was not compared to Scotland's system

• It was identical to Scotland's system

• It was considered more robust

• It was considered less robust

What prompted the need for action regarding the grading system?

• Positive feedback from students

• A lack of evidence

• Anomalies in results and evidence from experts

• A successful trial run