CLEAN : Protest against controversial British new high-speed railway

The video discusses the environmental and social impacts of the HS2 project, critiquing it as a vanity project that leads to significant deforestation and environmental damage. It highlights the economic and social implications, arguing that the funds could be better spent on essential services like healthcare. The video emphasizes the importance of protecting ancient woodlands and addressing climate change, comparing the destruction to the Amazon deforestation.

What is one of the main criticisms of vanity projects mentioned in the video?

• They are too expensive.

• They often lead to environmental damage.

• They lack public support.

• They are not well-planned.

What is a major concern about the HS2 project according to the video?

• It will not be completed on time.

• It will not improve transportation.

• It is too technologically advanced.

• It primarily benefits the wealthy.

What alternative use for the HS2 funds is suggested in the video?

• Developing new technology.

• Investing in renewable energy.

• Building more airports.

• Improving the National Health Service.

How does the video compare the environmental impact of HS2?

• It is necessary for progress.

• It is less damaging than urban development.

• It is similar to the deforestation of the Amazon.

• It is more beneficial than harmful.

What is the video’s stance on the necessity of HS2?

• It is essential for economic growth.

• It is a long-term investment.

• It is unnecessary given existing infrastructure.

• It is a temporary solution.