Contentious Supreme Court Nomination Sparks A Safety Call For Justices

The video discusses the need for increased security for Supreme Court justices due to past threats and incidents. It highlights the balance between protection and maintaining anonymity, as well as the political context affecting nominee security. The video also addresses the broader issue of national polarization and its impact on security perceptions.

What was the main focus of Gabe Roth's advocacy regarding the Supreme Court?

• Increasing the number of justices

• More transparency and protection for justices

• Reducing the power of the Supreme Court

• Improving the court's public image

Which justice was confirmed to have been threatened in 2017?

• Justice David Souter

• Justice Sonia Sotomayor

• Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

• Justice Stephen Breyer

What is one reason justices might decline protection when leaving Washington DC?

• They prefer to travel alone

• They have personal security teams

• They want to maintain their anonymity

• They believe the threat level is low

How many threats were received by federal judges and judiciary members last year?

• 4500

• 3000

• 5000

• 3500

Why might Supreme Court nominees be considered targets?

• They are frequently traveling

• They are involved in contentious political processes

• They have significant influence on law

• They are often in the public eye