Interview with pro Trump supporter at Ohio Protest

The video discusses the issue of censorship on social media platforms, questioning the right of platform owners to control speech. It highlights the involvement of government funding and contracts with agencies like the FBI and CIA, challenging the notion of these platforms as private companies. The speaker shares personal experiences of being censored and argues that silencing voices only amplifies them elsewhere. The video concludes with a warning about the pendulum effect, where those who support censorship may eventually find themselves oppressed.

What is the main concern the speaker raises about social media platform owners?

• They have too much control over speech.

• They are too lenient with content.

• They do not make enough profit.

• They are not innovative enough.

Why does the speaker question the private status of social media companies?

• They do not have any financial ties.

• They are not publicly traded.

• They receive public funding and have government contracts.

• They are owned by the government.

What personal experience does the speaker share regarding social media platforms?

• Being ignored by platform owners.

• Receiving financial support from platforms.

• Being removed despite not promoting violence.

• Being promoted for positive content.

According to the speaker, what is a consequence of taking away people's voices on social media?

• It leads to more platform engagement.

• It results in less public discourse.

• It makes them louder elsewhere.

• It makes them quieter.

What does the speaker suggest about the nature of oppression?

• It is a permanent state.

• It only affects a minority.

• It can eventually affect those who support it.

• It is always justified.