'Defund the Police' Experiment Fully Underway In Austin, Texas

'Defund the Police' Experiment Fully Underway In Austin, Texas

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

Austin, TX, significantly cut its police budget to fund homeless housing, sparking backlash in the conservative state. Despite concerns about rising crime, Austin's initiative aims to provide permanent supportive housing, similar to successful programs in Los Angeles. These efforts are expected to improve public safety and reduce costs associated with emergency services. Austin's reforms extend beyond budget cuts, including mental health options for 911 calls and police oversight, offering a model for other cities to address social issues more effectively.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the primary reason for Austin's significant police budget cuts?

To increase police presence in the city

To fund permanent supportive housing for the homeless

To reduce taxes for residents

To build new police stations

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did the Texas governor respond to the police budget cuts in Austin?

By ignoring the changes

By threatening to remove Austin police from city control

By increasing the police budget further

By supporting the reallocation of funds

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one of the expected outcomes of Austin's housing program?

Closure of local businesses

Improved safety through supportive housing

Higher taxes for residents

Increased crime rates

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What additional reform has Austin implemented alongside the police budget cuts?

A new tax on housing

A mental health option for 911 calls

A reduction in public transportation

An increase in parking fees

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did studies show about the Los Angeles housing program?

It improved housing stability and saved money

It increased the number of homeless people

It had no impact on the community

It was more expensive than traditional policing