Sir Keir Starmer: Decision to vote down independent inquiry into lobbying was wrong

The transcript discusses the inadequacy of current lobbying rules and the need for a transparent inquiry into government misconduct. It highlights the strict rules in the shadow cabinet regarding declarations and the issues surrounding lobbying for large government contracts. The text emphasizes the importance of accountability and the consequences for failing to declare meetings, suggesting that non-compliance should lead to removal from office.

What was the outcome of the vote for a transparent inquiry into government sleaze?

• The vote was passed unanimously.

• The vote was blocked by the government.

• The vote was postponed to a later date.

• The vote was supported by all parties.

What is emphasized as a key issue in the shadow cabinet's approach to lobbying?

• Lack of transparency in meetings.

• No rules regarding procurement.

• Open-door policy for lobbyists.

• Strict rules and declarations.

What is a major concern regarding government procurement contracts?

• Contracts are only given to foreign companies.

• Contracts are awarded without due process.

• Contracts are too small to be significant.

• Contracts are always transparent and fair.

What is the described nature of the lobbying process into the government?

• It is a revolving door process.

• It is a highly regulated process.

• It is a closed-door process.

• It is an open-door process.

What is considered a sackable offense in the context of government meetings?

• Holding meetings in private.

• Declaring meetings too late.

• Not declaring meetings.

• Attending too many meetings.