Supreme Court Rules Against NCAA

The video discusses the debate over compensating college athletes, highlighting the NCAA's stance on amateurism and the Supreme Court's ruling against the NCAA for violating antitrust laws. It also touches on the separate issue of athletes being compensated for their name and likeness, as various states pass laws to allow such payments.

What is the primary reason college athletes are not paid according to the NCAA?

• They are considered amateurs.

• They are not generating enough revenue.

• They are considered professionals.

• They receive enough from scholarships.

What was the Supreme Court's stance on the NCAA's policy of not paying athletes?

• It found the policy violated antitrust laws.

• It suggested minor changes to the policy.

• It supported the NCAA's policy.

• It was undecided on the matter.

Which Justice expressed skepticism about the NCAA's legal defense?

• Justice Elena Kagan

• Justice Brett Kavanaugh

• Justice Clarence Thomas

• Justice Sonia Sotomayor

What is the ongoing debate separate from the Supreme Court's decision?

• Whether athletes can be paid for their name and likeness.

• Whether athletes should receive more scholarships.

• Whether NCAA should be dissolved.

• Whether college sports should be banned.

What are some ways states are trying to help athletes earn money?

• By providing free housing.

• By allowing them to become social media influencers.

• By increasing tuition fees.

• By reducing the number of games.