Unilateral action to halt Brexit checks would be ‘unlawful’ – Michelle O’Neill

The transcript discusses the ongoing controversy regarding checks at ports, which are deemed unlawful without executive approval. Edwin Poots is expected to bring a paper to the executive for approval. The legal responsibilities of ministers and the need for protocol implementation are emphasized. Political dynamics, including the DUP's stance and past attempts to halt checks, are explored. The Permanent Secretary's role in ensuring compliance is highlighted, along with the challenges of navigating political and legal obligations.

What is required for controversial actions to continue according to the executive framework?

• Ministerial discretion

• Judicial review

• Public approval

• Executive approval

Who is responsible for ensuring the implementation of checks according to the executive policy?

• The Permanent Secretary

• The Executive Committee

• The Prime Minister

• The Minister

What is the stance of the executive parties, including the DUP, on the implementation of checks?

• They have no stance

• They are neutral

• They support it

• They oppose it

What was the outcome of Edwin Poots' previous attempt to stop the checks?

• He received support from the executive

• He was ignored

• He succeeded

• He was legally challenged

What is the current status quo regarding the implementation of checks?

• Checks are optional

• Checks are under review

• Checks must be implemented

• Checks are banned