Sir Keir Starmer campaigns in Wakefield - full interview

Sir Keir Starmer campaigns in Wakefield - full interview

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript covers various political topics, including a positive campaign in Wakefield, criticism of the government's asylum seeker policy, cross-party support for Ukraine, the issue of rail strikes and government inaction, and the debate over the ethics advisor position. The speaker emphasizes the need for serious responses to these issues and criticizes the current government's approach.

Read more

7 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main focus of the political campaign in Wakefield?

To ignore local concerns

To criticize the opposition

To earn every vote with a positive message

To focus on international issues

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the proposed Home Office policy regarding asylum seekers?

Immediate deportation

Tagging asylum seekers

Providing financial aid

Granting automatic citizenship

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the criticism of the government's handling of the asylum system?

It is too fast

It is too strict

It is too lenient

It is too slow

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the stance on supporting Ukraine?

No support at all

Support only in certain regions

Support only if politically beneficial

Cross-party support without politics

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the Labour Party's position on the rail strikes?

Support the strikes

Oppose the strikes

Remain neutral

Encourage more strikes

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the criticism of the Prime Minister regarding the rail strikes?

He wants the strikes to continue for political gain

He is unaware of the strikes

He is actively resolving the issue

He is supporting the workers

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the concern about removing the ethics advisor position?

It will improve governance

It will increase transparency

It will have no impact

It will reduce accountability