Justice Department Suggests Trump Delayed Efforts To Recover Documents

The transcript discusses the Department of Justice's (DOJ) legal filing against appointing a special master in the investigation involving former President Trump. The DOJ argues that a special master is unnecessary and could hinder their investigation into classified documents found at Trump's Florida estate. The filing reveals that Trump's team allegedly misled the DOJ about the return of sensitive materials and obstructed the investigation. The documents in question are highly classified, and their exposure could compromise national security. Despite Trump's claims of declassification, the DOJ states no such privilege was claimed when the documents were produced. The intelligence community continues to assess potential risks from the improper storage of these materials.

What is the DOJ's stance on appointing a special master in the investigation involving former President Trump?

• They recommend against it.

• They support it.

• They have not commented.

• They are neutral.

What did the DOJ accuse Trump's representatives of doing?

• Destroying the documents.

• Cooperating fully with the investigation.

• Returning all sensitive materials.

• Misleading the DOJ about the materials.

What level of classification did the seized documents have?

• Top Secret, SDI

• Public

• Secret

• Confidential

What is the potential consequence of revealing the classified documents to foreign adversaries?

• They will ignore the information.

• They will enhance their own security measures.

• They will determine how the information was intercepted.

• They will share it with allies.

What could be the impact of appointing a special master according to the DOJ?

• It would improve transparency.

• It would have no impact.

• It could hinder the investigation and intelligence report.

• It would expedite the investigation.