CLEAN : COP27 : EU ministers prepared to "walk away" if we do not have a result (Timmermans)

The transcript discusses the constructive role of the US in negotiations and the need for clear proposals to bridge existing gaps. Concerns are raised about recent developments that may hinder ambitions, particularly in focusing funds on those most in need. The importance of making good decisions is emphasized, with a preference for no decision over a bad one. The commitment to achieving results that address the climate crisis is highlighted, with a focus on reducing emissions to prevent worsening natural disasters.

What role has the US played according to the speaker?

• A constructive role

• A neutral role

• An indifferent role

• A destructive role

What is the speaker's stance on making decisions?

• Decisions should be made quickly

• No decision is better than a bad one

• A bad decision is acceptable

• Any decision is better than none

What is the EU's position on the climate crisis negotiations?

• They are indifferent

• They are committed to a good result

• They want to delay the decision

• They are against any negotiations

What is the consequence of not reducing emissions according to the speaker?

• Natural disasters will decrease

• There will be no impact

• Financial stability will improve

• Misery from natural disasters will increase

What is the speaker's view on deadlines for achieving results?

• Deadlines are flexible

• There is no deadline

• Deadlines are unnecessary

• There is a strict deadline