Julius Caesar 3.2 Performance: Antony, Lines 202-222

The speaker addresses a crowd, acknowledging the honorable nature of those who caused a mutiny. He admits to not knowing their private grievances but trusts their wisdom. The speaker, a plain man, contrasts himself with Brutus, a skilled orator, and emphasizes his lack of rhetorical skills. He presents Caesar's wounds to the audience, suggesting they speak for him. Finally, he imagines a scenario where he and Brutus switch roles, inciting the crowd to action.

What does Antony say about the people who committed the deed?

• They are foolish.

• They are wise and honorable.

• They are dishonorable.

• They are unknown to him.

How does Antony describe himself in comparison to Brutus?

• As a more powerful speaker.

• As a plain blunt man.

• As a better orator.

• As a man with more wit.

What does Antony claim he lacks in his speech?

• The power of speech to stir men's blood.

• The support of the public.

• The ability to speak plainly.

• The knowledge of Caesar's deeds.

What does Antony suggest he would do if he were Brutus?

• He would remain silent.

• He would leave Rome.

• He would praise Brutus.

• He would incite the crowd to mutiny.

What does Antony imagine would happen if he could speak through Caesar's wounds?

• The stones of Rome would rise and mutiny.

• The people would remain calm.

• Brutus would be praised.

• Caesar would be forgotten.