Ross: Shocked by Allegations Against Leon Cooperman

Ross: Shocked by Allegations Against Leon Cooperman

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Performing Arts

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses Leon Cooperman's reputation and his dealings with the SEC, focusing on insider trading and investment challenges. It explores the differences between public and private investments, highlighting the role of blackout periods. The conversation also covers how deep knowledge of a company can aid in predicting its actions, which should not be confused with insider trading. Finally, it addresses the SEC's current aggressive stance compared to the past.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the speaker's initial reaction to the allegations against Leon Cooperman?

They expected it to happen.

They have no opinion.

They are not surprised.

They are shocked and find it hard to believe.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main difference between public and private investments according to the speaker?

Public investments are more profitable.

Private investments are less regulated.

Private investments have more insider trading issues.

Public investments are more prone to insider trading problems.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the speaker describe Leon Cooperman's ability to predict company actions?

He relies on insider information.

He uses illegal methods.

He has no special ability.

He is good at guessing based on logical management actions.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the speaker suggest about the SEC's current approach compared to 10 years ago?

The SEC is less aggressive now.

The SEC's approach has not changed.

The SEC is more lenient now.

The SEC is more aggressive now.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the speaker's view on the appropriateness of the SEC's actions?

They believe the SEC is too lenient.

They have no opinion on the SEC's actions.

They think the SEC's actions are always justified.

They feel the SEC's actions need to be evaluated case by case.