CDC Chief Walensky Says She Didn’t Overrule Advisers on Booster

The transcript discusses the decision-making process regarding a controversial decision, addressing media portrayals and concerns about overruling an advisory committee. It includes perspectives from an advisor who felt heard, despite voting against the decision. The speaker clarifies that the decision was not an overruling but a result of careful consideration of scientific deliberations. The process was transparent, involving top scientists, and aimed to maintain public confidence.

What was the speaker's stance on the advisory committee's votes?

What did the speaker suggest people should do regarding the deliberations?