Schenck vs United States Explained in 5 Minutes: US History Review

The video discusses the landmark Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States, highlighting the Espionage Act of 1917 and its impact on freedom of speech during wartime. Charles Schenck's opposition to the draft led to his arrest, and the case established the 'clear and present danger' doctrine. The video emphasizes that civil liberties are not absolute, especially in wartime, and concludes with a call to subscribe to HipHughes History.

What is the main idea discussed in the introduction of Schenck v. United States?

• The role of Congress in making laws.

• The importance of the Bill of Rights.

• The Supreme Court's interpretation of civil liberties.

• The absolute nature of civil liberties.

What was the purpose of the Espionage Act of 1917?

• To protect German immigrants.

• To promote freedom of speech.

• To encourage enlistment in the armed forces.

• To prevent interference with military operations.

Why was Charles Schenck arrested?

• For violating the 13th Amendment.

• For helping Germany win the war.

• For printing leaflets against the draft.

• For supporting the war effort.

What analogy did Oliver Wendell Holmes use in the Supreme Court decision?

• A ship without a captain.

• A house divided against itself.

• Yelling fire in a crowded theater.

• A storm in a teacup.

What doctrine was established by the Supreme Court in this case?

• The doctrine of clear and present danger.

• The doctrine of absolute freedom.

• The doctrine of civil liberties.

• The doctrine of wartime exceptions.