Why Do We Have Lines On Our Palms?

Why Do We Have Lines On Our Palms?

Assessment

Interactive Video

Physics, Science, Chemistry, Health Sciences, Biology

KG - University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video explains the formation and function of palmar flexion creases, which develop around the 12th week of gestation. These creases help the skin of the palm to stretch and fold, aiding in various hand movements. Scientists have classified these creases into three main types: distal palmar, proximal palmar, and thanar creases. Besides their functional role, these creases can indicate certain congenital disorders. The video also discusses the cultural practice of palmistry, which lacks scientific support and is considered a pseudoscience. Different cultures interpret palm lines differently, and the video advises skepticism towards palmistry without empirical evidence.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the primary function of palmar flexion creases?

To identify fingerprints

To provide a decorative pattern on the palm

To help the skin of the palm squeeze and stretch

To predict future events

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which of the following is NOT one of the primary palmar creases?

Proximal palmar crease

Distal palmar crease

Medial palmar crease

Thenar crease

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How do palmar flexion creases benefit hand movements?

They increase the size of the hand

They prevent the hand from moving

They allow the skin to adapt to complex positions

They make the skin more rigid

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a common belief about the lines on our palms?

They can foretell the future

They are unique to each individual

They can predict the weather

They are the same for everyone

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is palmistry considered a pseudoscience?

It is based on scientific research

It has consistent interpretations across cultures

It lacks empirical support

It is widely accepted by scientists