Judicial Branch and Making Law

The video tutorial explains the differences between civil and common law systems, focusing on the common law system in the United States. It describes the trial level where disputes are initially handled and the role of the appellate courts in reviewing trial court decisions. The appellate courts assess whether laws were applied correctly and constitutionally, and their decisions contribute to common law, effectively allowing the judicial branch to participate in law-making.

What is the primary role of appellate courts in the common law system of the United States?

• To conduct trials and find facts

• To interpret laws as applied at the trial level

• To enforce laws at the state level

• To create new laws independently

What do appellate courts review when assessing trial court decisions?

• The procedural undertakings and the law's constitutionality

• The personal opinions of the judges

• The popularity of the decision among the public

• The financial implications of the case

What happens if an appellate court finds a law unconstitutional?

• The court issues an opinion that can change the application of the law

• The law is enforced until the next legislative session

• The law is sent back to the trial court for revision

• The law is immediately repealed

How do appellate court decisions influence the legal system?

• They become part of common law and affect statutory rules

• They have no impact on existing laws

• They are merely suggestions for future cases

• They are only applicable to the specific case reviewed

In what way does the judicial branch contribute to law-making?

• By drafting new legislation

• By interpreting laws and adding to statutory rules through court decisions

• By enforcing laws at the federal level

• By conducting public opinion surveys