Judge blocks Trump's order ending citizenship at birth

A federal judge has temporarily blocked President Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship, citing it as unconstitutional. This decision follows arguments from 22 states. The State of Washington's Attorney General expressed satisfaction with the ruling, emphasizing its importance for American democracy. Meanwhile, the White House criticized the decision, viewing it as part of ongoing resistance against Trump's immigration policies. This ruling is the first major test of Trump's broader immigration agenda, which has faced multiple legal challenges.

What was the main reason for the federal judge's temporary block on President Trump's order?

• It was deemed unconstitutional by 22 states.

• It was not signed by the President.

• It was not supported by Congress.

• It was not popular among the public.

Which states were involved in bringing the temporary restraining order against the executive order?

• California, Texas, New York, and Florida

• Washington, Oregon, Arizona, and Illinois

• Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana

• Nevada, Utah, Colorado, and New Mexico

What did the judge say about the executive order from the bench?

• It was a well-crafted legal document.

• It was the most unconstitutional act he had seen in 40 years.

• It was a minor legal issue.

• It was a necessary measure for national security.

How did the White House describe the judge's decision?

• A minor setback

• A radical leftist move

• A victory for democracy

• A bipartisan agreement

What is the White House's stance on the lawsuits against the birthright citizenship order?

• They will negotiate with the states.

• They plan to withdraw the order.

• They are ready to face them in court.

• They will ignore the lawsuits.