Anti-Vaxxers, Conspiracy Theories, & Epistemic Responsibility: Crash Course Philosophy

The video discusses the resurgence of diseases due to anti-vaccine beliefs and introduces the concept of epistemic responsibility in philosophy. W. K. Clifford argues that it is wrong to believe anything without sufficient evidence, using a ship owner analogy to illustrate the potential harm of such beliefs. William James counters by suggesting that some beliefs, like religious faith, can be morally held without evidence if they are live, forced, and momentous options. The video concludes by highlighting the importance of understanding and arguing against baseless beliefs.

How does Clifford's view on private beliefs challenge the notion of personal belief systems?

What counterarguments did William James present against Clifford's thesis on belief and evidence?

What is the significance of epistemic responsibility in the context of public health and personal beliefs?