CLEAN : Olympics: Tribunal lets Klishina back into Rio Games

The video discusses a decision made on the merits, not as a procedural victory. Despite evidence presented, the athlete was deemed clean and met eligibility requirements. There was no implication of wrongdoing, but concerns were raised about the potential for manipulation even for clean athletes.

What was the basis of the decision regarding the athlete's status?

• It was a procedural victory.

• It was based on the merits.

• It was due to a lack of evidence.

• It was a temporary decision.

What did the decision confirm about the athlete?

• She was disqualified.

• She had manipulated results.

• She was a clean athlete.

• She was not eligible.

What was the decision's stance on the evidence presented?

• It was ignored.

• It showed the athlete was guilty.

• It was inconclusive.

• It confirmed the athlete's cleanliness.

What concern did the decision highlight regarding clean athletes?

• They have no protection.

• They are always under suspicion.

• They might face manipulation.

• They could be disqualified easily.

What was not a factor in the decision about the athlete?

• The potential for manipulation.

• Her personal conduct.

• Her eligibility requirements.

• The evidence presented.