Supreme Court Blocks Some Florida Ex-Felons From Voting

Supreme Court Blocks Some Florida Ex-Felons From Voting

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses a Supreme Court decision that upheld a Florida law requiring ex-felons to pay fines and fees before voting. This decision affects over 774,000 people who may be unable to vote unless they clear their debts. Previously, an amendment allowed most felons to vote after serving their time, but a new law added financial stipulations. The court's decision was split 5-4, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissenting, highlighting the impact on low-income individuals.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What condition must ex-felons in Florida meet to regain their voting rights according to the recent court decision?

Attend a rehabilitation program

Pay all fines and fees

Complete community service hours

Register for a voter education course

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the impact of the constitutional amendment passed last year in Florida?

It allowed all residents to vote regardless of criminal history

It permitted most felons to vote after completing their sentences

It eliminated the need for voter registration

It increased the voting age to 21

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who introduced the law that added the fee stipulation for ex-felons to vote?

Democratic lawmakers

Republican lawmakers

Independent lawmakers

The Supreme Court

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How was the decision to reject the appeal split among the justices?

5-4 split along ideological lines

6-3 split favoring the appeal

4-5 split against the appeal

Unanimous decision

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Justice Sonia Sotomayor's main concern in her dissent?

The ruling was not clear enough

The ruling disenfranchises people due to poverty

The ruling was too lenient on ex-felons

The ruling favored one political party