U.K.'s Johnson Denies Being Warned About Lockdown Party

The speaker discusses an event that was mistakenly allowed to proceed despite being against COVID rules. They express disbelief that the event went ahead without warnings from others, emphasizing that they would have remembered if they had been informed of any rule violations.

What was the main issue the speaker highlighted regarding the event?

• The event was against COVID rules.

• The event was poorly organized.

• The event was too expensive.

• The event was not attended by many people.

Why does the speaker find it hard to believe the event went ahead?

• Because it was not a popular event.

• Because it was against the rules they were enforcing.

• Because it was held at an inconvenient time.

• Because it was not well-publicized.

How does the speaker describe their reaction to the event proceeding?

• They were supportive of it.

• They were surprised it was allowed.

• They were indifferent to it.

• They were excited about it.

What does the speaker emphasize about their knowledge of the event's compliance?

• They were fully aware of the rules.

• They were warned multiple times.

• They were not informed about the rule breach.

• They organized the event themselves.

What does the speaker claim they would have done if they had known about the rule breach?

• They would have ignored it.

• They would have remembered it.

• They would have supported it.

• They would have forgotten it.