The transcript discusses the government's decision-making process regarding a crisis. It questions whether the government acted callously or incompetently by either ignoring or not waiting for crucial figures. The figures, now public, are shocking, prompting a call for the government to urgently reverse its decision.

What does the speaker imply about the government's decision if they were aware of the figures?

• They were being cautious.

• They were being callous.

• They were being considerate.

• They were being cooperative.

What does the speaker suggest about the government's competence if they did not consider the figures?

• They were incompetent.

• They were indifferent.

• They were insightful.

• They were innovative.

Why does the speaker believe the government should have waited before making a decision?

• To gather more public opinion.

• To consult with international experts.

• To wait for the figures to be published.

• To ensure media coverage.

What is the speaker's reaction to the figures now being public?

• They are relieved.

• They are indifferent.

• They are shocked.

• They are amused.

What action does the speaker urge the government to take?

• To reverse the decision.

• To consult with the public.

• To delay the decision.

• To ignore the figures.