Apple's App Store Is a 'Walled Garden,' Says Epic Games

The transcript discusses Epic's legal battle against Apple, focusing on claims that Apple's App Store policies are designed to lock users into its ecosystem rather than ensuring safety or privacy. Epic argues for alternative app distribution and payment methods on iOS. The discussion covers the complexities of defining monopoly power under the Sherman Act, with Epic and Apple differing on market definitions. The trial will rely on expert testimony and internal documents to determine if Apple's practices are monopolistic. Epic seeks an injunction to open iOS to other app stores, with a decision expected months after the trial.

How does the definition of the market play a role in the legal arguments presented?

In what ways do both sides plan to present evidence regarding monopoly power?

What remedy is Epic seeking in its lawsuit against Apple?