The Strategic Showdown: Hannibal vs. Fabius Maximus in the Second Punic War

Hannibal, after plundering the Agavalanus Valley, faces a strategic Roman army led by Fabius Maximus. Despite health issues in his army, Hannibal continues his campaign, while Rome focuses on Iberia to cut off his reinforcements. Fabius employs a cautious strategy, avoiding direct battles, which frustrates both Hannibal and the Roman Senate. Hannibal attempts to provoke Fabius by attacking Campania but ultimately executes a clever escape from Roman entrapment, showcasing his tactical brilliance.

In what ways did Hannibal's tactics reflect his understanding of Roman military weaknesses?

How did Hannibal manage to escape from the Roman forces?

What were the consequences of Fabius's passive strategy for his political reputation?

What lessons can be learned from the encounters between Hannibal and Fabius?