USA/COLOMBIA: PRESIDENT SAMPER STRIPPED OF US VISA

USA/COLOMBIA: PRESIDENT SAMPER STRIPPED OF US VISA

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, History

9th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Wayground Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the ineligibility of President Samper for a US visitor's visa under Section 212A-2C of the Immigration and Nationality Act, due to alleged involvement in illegal narcotics trafficking. It highlights the negative impact of such US policies on international relations, particularly in Colombia, where it fuels anti-imperialist sentiments. The transcript also questions the fairness and legal basis of the US decision, arguing that Samper has not been proven guilty of any crime against the US and is acting within the Colombian Constitution.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does Section 212A-2C of the Immigration and Nationality Act address?

Requirements for obtaining a work visa in the U.S.

Guidelines for diplomatic immunity

Eligibility for a U.S. visa based on suspected involvement in illegal activities

Regulations for student visas in the U.S.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why was President Samper deemed ineligible for a U.S. visitor's visa?

He was accused of espionage

He was suspected of aiding illegal narcotics trafficking

He violated U.S. immigration laws

He was involved in a financial scandal

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a potential consequence of using visa denial as a tool in international policy?

It leads to increased tourism

It can create anti-imperialist sentiments

It fosters economic growth

It strengthens diplomatic relations

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What sentiment does the use of visa denial as a policy tool potentially awaken in Colombia?

Pro-Americanism

Anti-imperialism

Neutrality

Isolationism

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What argument is made in defense of President Samper regarding his visa revocation?

He has committed crimes against the U.S.

He has been proven guilty by Colombian Congress

He has violated international law

He is acting within the Colombian Constitution