French lawyer reax to judge ruling against bail for Polanski

The transcript discusses the potential for an appeal by Mr. Polanski regarding a legal decision, the current status of the US extradition request, and Mr. Polanski's commitment to remain in Switzerland throughout the extradition process.

What is the initial reaction of Mr. Polanski's side regarding the decision?

• They have decided not to appeal.

• They are indifferent to the decision.

• They are disappointed but considering an appeal.

• They are satisfied with the decision.

Who is responsible for deciding on the appeal?

• The Tribunal of Lausanne

• The Swiss Federal Court

• The United Nations

• The European Court of Human Rights

What was the response of the Swiss authorities to the arguments presented by Mr. Polanski's lawyer?

• They did not respond to the arguments.

• They partially agreed with the arguments.

• They rejected the arguments outright.

• They fully agreed with the arguments.

Why might the Swiss authorities not have responded to the extradition arguments?

• The extradition request from the US has not yet arrived.

• They are waiting for a decision from the European Union.

• They have already made a decision.

• They are not involved in the extradition process.

What commitment has Mr. Polanski made regarding his stay in Switzerland?

• He will stay in Switzerland only if the appeal is successful.

• He will move to another European country.

• He will remain in Switzerland throughout the extradition process.

• He will leave Switzerland immediately.